Order Your Own Writing Help Now -
Submission and Examination - University of Liverpool
Assisting a trustee's breach of fiduciary duty. Extracts from liverpool thesis this document. Where a person assists a trustee in the breach of a fiduciary duty owed to the beneficiaries, he may be held liable, both in equity by way of knowing assistance, or at essay amy tan common law by liverpool thesis way of one of the economic torts. The adoption by promotion of tourism essay the House of Lords in Twinsectra v Yardley of the thesis criminal test of dishonesty as the basis of liability in binding oxford knowing assistance has made the common law route a more attractive means of liverpool, obtaining recovery from such an accessory. Discuss. If a stranger knowingly and dishonestly assists a trustee in a breach of Was the atomic and Nagasaki, trust he will be liable for accessory liability.
In the case of Barnes v Addy (1874) LR 9 Ch App 244, assistance was described as one of two limbs constituting accessory liability. Knowing assistance is the equitable action for obtaining recovery from someone who has assisted in a breach of liverpool, trust (Baughen, 2002). After Royal Brunei Airlines Sdn Bhd v Tan  2 AC 378, knowing assistance is now more properly identified as 'dishonest assistance' (Speirs, 2002). Promotion Essay! Lord Nicholls in Tan stated that dishonesty is the touchstone of liability for knowing assistance (at para.387). The decision of the Privy Council in Tan and its acceptance by the House of Lords in Twinsectra Ltd v Yardley and others  Lloyd's Rep Bank 438 has brought about an important shift in the law on accessory liability (Moffat, 2005). Twinsectra Ltd lent money to Mr Yardley. Mr Sims, the solicitor acting for liverpool, Mr Yardley, gave an undertaking that the loan monies would be used to purchase properties only. Mr Sims paid over atomic of Hiroshima and Nagasaki ethical?, the loan monies to a second solicitor, Mr Leach, who knew of the undertaking which had been given by liverpool Mr Sims.
Nevertheless, Mr Leach applied the essay two kinds amy tan funds according to Mr Yardley's instructions, which were not in agreement with the undertaking. It was alleged that the payment of funds by Mr Sims to Mr Leach constituted a breach of trust, and that Mr Leach had dishonestly assisted him in doing this. . read more. Liverpool! A claimant who can prove that the conduct would be regarded as dishonest by a reasonable and honest person has probably gone nine-tenths of the way towards proving that the thesis defendant is likely to have recognised that such conduct was so regarded. Furthermore, the evidence available to prove the liverpool objective element of dishonesty is likely to be highly relevant to Was the bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki ethical? the subjective element of the combined test (Stafford, 2002). Thesis! Due to 5 paragraph essay about the subjective element of the combined test, it is possible that a defendant may decline to thesis give evidence in order to improve his prospects of success at trial. The burden of proof may remain with the leadership claimant, but, as the defendants in Agip (Africa) Ltd v Jackson  Ch 547 found, silence need not disable the court from deciding the thesis issue unfavourably. Stafford (2002) suggested that a possible procedural consequence of the decision in Was the bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki Twinsectra is its impact upon thesis the prospect of a summary determination of the claim. In the context of accessory liability, Twinsectra introduced uncertainty and confusion over the state of mind of an accessory who assists in thesis a breach of trust. In effect, the decision has introduced the test of liverpool thesis, dishonesty appropriate for the purposes of criminal liability into civil liability (Panesar, 2003). Hence, this area of law is now more nebulous than before (Speirs, 2002).
In support of suggested thesis, Twinsectra is the case of Barlow Clowes International Ltd (in liq) v Eurotrust International Ltd  UKPC 37 which confirmed that the test in Twinsectra is the correct test, but clarified its application (Blair, 2005). It is through the thesis economic torts that the common law protects against the intentional violation of binding oxford, economic interests (Carty, 1988). The principle economic tort is interference with another's rights (the most well-known example of which is inducement to breach a contract); other economic torts include conspiracy, intimidation, and wrongful use of confidential information (Sales Stilitz, 1999). . read more. The common law route of obtaining recovery through one of the economic torts appears much easier, and more attractive, in comparison. BIBLOIGRAPHY ANDREWS, G. (2003) 'The redundancy of dishonest assistance' Conveyancer and Property Lawyer Sept/Oct 398 BAGSHAW, R. Liverpool Thesis! (1998) 'Can the economic torts be unified?' 18 Oxford Journal of atomic bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki, Legal Studies 729 BAUGHEN, S. (2002) Professionals Fiduciaries: Perils and Pitfalls, Gostick Hall Publications, Essex BLAIR, A. (2005) 'It's not all in thesis the mind' 155 New Law Journal 1804 CARTY (1988) 'Intentional violation of economic interests: the limits of common law liability' 104 Law Quarterly Review 250 KENNY, P.H. Of Hiroshima Ethical?! (2002) 'Helping to break an undertaking' Conveyancer and liverpool Property Lawyer Jul/Aug 303 MOFFAT, G. (2005) Trusts Law (Text and Materials), 4th edition, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge PANESAR, S. (2003) 'A loan subject to a trust and essay amy tan dishonest assistance by a third party' Journal of International Banking Law 18(1) 9 REED, P. (2002) Twinsectra v Yardley. Available from: http://www.trustees.org.uk/review-index/Trustees-Twinsectra-v-Yardley.php (Accessed: 01/03/06) RICHARDSON, N. (2002) 'Twinsectra: knowing assistance' Trust Law International 16(3) ROGERS, W.V.H. (2002) Winfield and Jolowicz on Tort, 16th edition, Sweet Maxwell, London SALES, P. STILITZ D. (1999) 'Intentional infliction of liverpool thesis, harm by unlawful means' 115 Law Quarterly Review 411 SIR LEONARD HOFFMAN (1994) 'The redundancy of knowing assistance', The Frontiers of Liability Volume 1 (Ed: Peter Birks) Oxford University Press, Oxford SPEIRS, A. 'Caught in the tangled web' 2 Web Journal of Current Legal Issues. 5 Paragraph About Leadership! Available from: http://webjcli.ncl.ac.uk/2000/issue2/speirs2.html (Accessed: 01/03/06) STAFFORD, A. 'Dishonesty: Twinsectra and beyond' Professional Negligence 18(4) 229 THORNTON, R. (2002) 'Dishonest assistance: guilty conduct or guilty mind?' The Cambridge Law Journal 525 WEIR, T. (1997) Economic Torts, OUP: Clarendon, Oxford WEIR, T. (2002) Tort Law, OUP: Clarendon, Oxford YEO, T.M. Liverpool! TJIO, H. (2002) 'Knowing what is dishonesty' 118 Law Quarterly Review 502 ?? ?? ?? ?? MA in Legal Studies Candidate Number: 52169 Law of Property 1 1 . read more.
This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our University Degree Tort Law section. Start learning 29% faster today 150,000+ documents available Just £6.99 a month. Join over 1.2 million students every month Accelerate your learning by 29% Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month. Related University Degree Tort Law essays. 'The existence of a duty of care is ultimately a question of policy'. Discuss. However, the incorporation of the Human Rights Act takes away a degree of protection which judges had sought to create when they decided previous cases in the manner in which they did. This protection was that of protecting society and the institutions from the opening of floodgates which would in turn deplete the monetary sources available. Tortious liability arises from the breach of duty primarily fixed by law; such duty . Clapham omnibus this is because they are more skilled, they will be judged buy their own profession, however junior doctors will also be expected to exercise the about leadership same degree of skill as experienced doctors.
In the case of Bolam v Friern Hospital Management Committee 2, the plaintiff agreed to and underwent electroconvulsive therapy, treatment for his mental illness. Liverpool Thesis! A Critical Examination of the thesis binding oxford Concept of thesis, Breach of Duty of Care. Notice his use of Was the atomic ethical?, 'ought' and liverpool 'reasonably'. There is a large moral component to promotion of tourism his test. It is not just about what can be foreseen, but about what 'ought' to be foreseen - These tests are of most use when the law is liverpool thesis uncertain. These are concepts that judges use when deciding whether or not a duty of essay, care ought to be recognised in thesis new situations. concurrent liability(TM) in two kinds amy tan tort and contract. Therefore damages would be reduced, which would not, generally, be the case in a contractual claim. S1 of the Law Reform (Contributory Negligence) Act 1945 states that if the thesis claimant contributes to his own injuries by failing to take reasonable care of two kinds amy tan, himself, his damages will be reduced by a. amp;quot;The 'Standard practice' defence allows too many careless professionals to avoid liabilityamp;quot; Discuss. In this case the courts have felt the need to follow the reasoning given in Nettleship v Weston  3ALL ER 581.Where a learner driver was held subject to liverpool the same standard to that of the reasonably competent driver.
This shows the 2005 courts trying to exercise that doctors cannot set their own legal standard. To succeed in a negligence action in tort, the claimant must prove three things. what ever happens, if this defence was proved successful Mr Arantes would not be able to claim for damages. Liverpool Thesis! The other defence that Mr and Mrs Fontes could use is contributory negligence, this defence will apply in actions under the act, and a visitor who has failed to take reasonable. To successfully pursue a claim in the Tort of negligence there are three elements . 6 the courts decided to the retreat back to essay the traditional three stage test that is used to this day. The test used today consists of three stages.
The first of these stages is whether the consequences of the defendant's actions were reasonably foreseeable. Defamation Law: A Comparative Study of the US and the UK. is a complex problem as societal factors play in on a much higher level. Further, both models are constantly evolving, and their position remains forever unclear. Further, the Indian defamation law is based primarily on common law. However, it varies significantly as well when compared to thesis modern defamation law of the 5 paragraph essay about UK. of student written work Annotated by. experienced teachers Ideas and feedback to. improve your own work.
Marked by Teachers, The Student Room and Get Revising are all trading names of The Student Room Group Ltd. TurnItIn the anti-plagiarism experts are also used by: Want to read the rest? Sign up to view the whole essay and download the PDF for liverpool thesis, anytime access on your computer, tablet or smartphone. Start learning 29% faster today 150,000+ documents available Just £6.99 a month. Looking for expert help with your Law work?
Created by teachers, our study guides highlight the really important stuff you need to know.
Need Help Writing an Essay? -
Dissertation & Thesis Printing and Binding Liverpool - Mail Boxes Etc
Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy. The term natural law is liverpool thesis ambiguous. 5 Paragraph Essay About. It refers to a type of liverpool thesis, moral theory, as well as to a type of legal theory, but the core claims of the two kinds of theory are logically independent. Essay Leadership. It does not refer to the laws of liverpool thesis, nature, the laws that science aims to 5 paragraph about describe. According to natural law moral theory, the moral standards that govern human behavior are, in some sense, objectively derived from the nature of human beings and the nature of the world. While being logically independent of natural law legal theory, the two theories intersect. However, the majority of the article will focus on natural law legal theory.
According to natural law legal theory, the authority of legal standards necessarily derives, at liverpool least in part, from essay, considerations having to do with the thesis, moral merit of those standards. There are a number of different kinds of suggested thesis, natural law legal theories, differing from each other with respect to the role that morality plays in determining the authority of legal norms. Liverpool Thesis. The conceptual jurisprudence of John Austin provides a set of necessary and sufficient conditions for the existence of law that distinguishes law from non-law in every possible world. Classical natural law theory such as the theory of Thomas Aquinas focuses on essay amy tan the overlap between natural law moral and legal theories. Thesis. Similarly, the neo-naturalism of John Finnis is a development of classical natural law theory. In contrast, the procedural naturalism of Lon L. Fuller is a rejection of the conceptual naturalist idea that there are necessary substantive moral constraints on of Hiroshima and Nagasaki the content of law. Lastly, Ronald Dworkin’s theory is a response and critique of legal positivism.
All of liverpool, these theories subscribe to one or more basic tenets of natural law legal theory and of Hiroshima ethical?, are important to thesis its development and thesis, influence. 1. Two Kinds of liverpool, Natural Law Theory. At the outset, it is important to distinguish two kinds of theory that go by amy tan the name of natural law. The first is a theory of liverpool thesis, morality that is roughly characterized by the following theses. First, moral propositions have what is sometimes called objective standing in the sense that such propositions are the bearers of objective truth-value; that is, moral propositions can be objectively true or false. Though moral objectivism is sometimes equated with moral realism (see, e.g., Moore 1992, 190: the truth of any moral proposition lies in its correspondence with a mind- and convention-independent moral reality), the relationship between the two theories is controversial. Geoffrey Sayre-McCord (1988), for example, views moral objectivism as one species of moral realism, but not the only form; on thesis Sayre-McCord's view, moral subjectivism and moral intersubjectivism are also forms of moral realism. Strictly speaking, then, natural law moral theory is committed only to the objectivity of moral norms. The second thesis constituting the core of natural law moral theory is the claim that standards of morality are in some sense derived from, or entailed by, the nature of the world and thesis, the nature of human beings. St. Thomas Aquinas, for example, identifies the 5 paragraph essay about, rational nature of human beings as that which defines moral law: the thesis, rule and measure of human acts is the reason, which is the first principle of human acts (Aquinas, ST I-II, Q.90, A.I).
On this common view, since human beings are by nature rational beings, it is 5 paragraph morally appropriate that they should behave in liverpool, a way that conforms to their rational nature. Thus, Aquinas derives the moral law from the nature of human beings (thus, natural law). But there is another kind of 5 paragraph essay about, natural law theory having to do with the relationship of liverpool thesis, morality to law. According to natural law theory of law, there is no clean division between the notion of law and the notion of morality. Though there are different versions of natural law theory, all subscribe to the thesis that there are at least some laws that depend for their authority not on some pre-existing human convention, but on the logical relationship in which they stand to moral standards.
Otherwise put, some norms are authoritative in virtue of their moral content, even when there is Was the bombings and Nagasaki ethical? no convention that makes moral merit a criterion of legal validity. The idea that the concepts of law and morality intersect in some way is thesis called the Overlap Thesis. As an empirical matter, many natural law moral theorists are also natural law legal theorists, but the two theories, strictly speaking, are logically independent. One can deny natural law theory of law but hold a natural law theory of morality. 5 Paragraph Essay Leadership. John Austin, the thesis, most influential of the early legal positivists, for essay amy tan example, denied the Overlap Thesis but held something that resembles a natural law ethical theory. Indeed, Austin explicitly endorsed the view that it is not necessarily true that the legal validity of a norm depends on whether its content conforms to morality. But while Austin thus denied the Overlap Thesis, he accepted an objectivist moral theory; indeed, Austin inherited his utilitarianism almost wholesale from J.S. Liverpool Thesis. Mill and Jeremy Bentham. Here it is worth noting that utilitarians sometimes seem to suggest that they derive their utilitarianism from certain facts about human nature; as Bentham once wrote, nature has placed mankind under the governance of two sovereign masters, pain and pleasure.
It is for them alone to point out what we ought to do, as well as to determine what we shall do. On the one hand the essay amy tan, standard of right and wrong, on the other the chain of causes and effects, are fastened to their throne (Bentham 1948, 1). Thus, a commitment to natural law theory of morality is consistent with the denial of natural law theory of law. Conversely, one could, though this would be unusual, accept a natural law theory of law without holding a natural law theory of morality. One could, for example, hold that the liverpool thesis, conceptual point of law is, in part, to reproduce the demands of 5 paragraph essay about, morality, but also hold a form of ethical subjectivism (or relativism). On this peculiar view, the conceptual point of law would be to liverpool thesis enforce those standards that are morally valid in virtue of cultural consensus. For this reason, natural law theory of law is logically independent of natural law theory of morality. The remainder of this essay will be exclusively concerned with natural law theories of thesis binding oxford, law.
a. The Project of Conceptual Jurisprudence. The principal objective of conceptual (or analytic) jurisprudence has traditionally been to thesis provide an account of what distinguishes law as a system of norms from other systems of norms, such as ethical norms. As John Austin describes the project, conceptual jurisprudence seeks the essence or nature which is Was the atomic ethical? common to all laws that are properly so called (Austin 1995, 11). Accordingly, the task of conceptual jurisprudence is to liverpool provide a set of necessary and sufficient conditions for the existence of law that distinguishes law from 5 paragraph leadership, non-law in every possible world. While this task is usually interpreted as an attempt to analyze the concepts of law and legal system, there is some confusion as to both the value and character of conceptual analysis in philosophy of law. Thesis. As Brian Leiter (1998) points out, philosophy of law is one of the ib tok 2005, few philosophical disciplines that takes conceptual analysis as its principal concern; most other areas in philosophy have taken a naturalistic turn, incorporating the liverpool thesis, tools and methods of the sciences. To clarify the role of conceptual analysis in law, Brian Bix (1995) distinguishes a number of thesis, different purposes that can be served by conceptual claims: (1) to track linguistic usage; (2) to stipulate meanings; (3) to explain what is thesis important or essential about a class of objects; and (4) to establish an evaluative test for the concept-word. Bix takes conceptual analysis in law to be primarily concerned with (3) and (4). In any event, conceptual analysis of law remains an important, if controversial, project in contemporary legal theory. Conceptual theories of law have traditionally been characterized in terms of their posture towards the Overlap Thesis.
Thus, conceptual theories of law have traditionally been divided into two main categories: those like natural law legal theory that affirm there is a conceptual relation between law and morality and those like legal positivism that deny such a relation. All forms of natural law theory subscribe to the Overlap Thesis, which asserts that there is some kind of two kinds amy tan, non-conventional relation between law and morality. According to this view, then, the thesis, notion of law cannot be fully articulated without some reference to moral notions. Though the Overlap Thesis may seem unambiguous, there are a number of different ways in ib tok 2005, which it can be interpreted. The strongest construction of the Overlap Thesis forms the foundation for the classical naturalism of Aquinas and Blackstone. Aquinas distinguishes four kinds of law: (1) eternal law; (2) natural law; (3) human law; and (4) divine law. Eternal law is comprised of those laws that govern the nature of an eternal universe; as Susan Dimock (1999, 22) puts it, one can think of eternal law as comprising all those scientific (physical, chemical, biological, psychological, etc.) 'laws' by which the universe is ordered.
Divine law is concerned with those standards that must be satisfied by a human being to achieve eternal salvation. One cannot discover divine law by natural reason alone; the precepts of divine law are disclosed only through divine revelation. The natural law is comprised of those precepts of the eternal law that govern the behavior of beings possessing reason and free will. The first precept of the natural law, according to Aquinas, is the somewhat vacuous imperative to liverpool do good and ib tok, avoid evil. Liverpool. Here it is worth noting that Aquinas holds a natural law theory of morality: what is good and evil, according to Aquinas, is derived from the essay amy tan, rational nature of thesis, human beings. Good and evil are thus both objective and suggested, universal. But Aquinas is also a natural law legal theorist.
On his view, a human law (that is, that which is promulgated by liverpool human beings) is suggested valid only insofar as its content conforms to the content of the liverpool thesis, natural law; as Aquinas puts the point: [E]very human law has just so much of the nature of law as is derived from the law of essay two kinds amy tan, nature. But if in liverpool, any point it deflects from the law of nature, it is no longer a law but a perversion of law (ST I-II, Q.95, A.II). To paraphrase Augustine's famous remark, an unjust law is ib tok essay 2005 really no law at all. The idea that a norm that does not conform to the natural law cannot be legally valid is the defining thesis of conceptual naturalism. As William Blackstone describes the thesis, This law of nature, being co-eval with mankind and dictated by God himself, is of course superior in obligation to any other. It is binding over all the globe, in all countries, and at all times: no human laws are of any validity, if contrary to this; and such of them as are valid derive all their force, and all their authority, mediately or immediately, from this original (1979, 41). In this passage, Blackstone articulates the two claims that constitute the theoretical core of conceptual naturalism: 1) there can be no legally valid standards that conflict with the natural law; and 2) all valid laws derive what force and authority they have from the natural law.
It should be noted that classical naturalism is liverpool consistent with allowing a substantial role to human beings in the manufacture of law. While the classical naturalist seems committed to the claim that the law necessarily incorporates all moral principles, this claim does not imply that the law is exhausted by the set of moral principles. There will still be coordination problems (e.g., which side of the road to drive on) that can be resolved in any number of ways consistent with the set of moral principles. Thus, the classical naturalist does not deny that human beings have considerable discretion in creating natural law. Rather she claims only that such discretion is necessarily limited by moral norms: legal norms that are promulgated by human beings are valid only if they are consistent with morality. Critics of conceptual naturalism have raised a number of objections to this view. First, it has often been pointed out that, contra Augustine, unjust laws are all-too- frequently enforced against promotion essay persons. As Austin petulantly put the point: Now, to say that human laws which conflict with the Divine law are not binding, that is to say, are not laws, is to talk stark nonsense. Liverpool. The most pernicious laws, and therefore those which are most opposed to essay the will of God, have been and are continually enforced as laws by judicial tribunals. Suppose an act innocuous, or positively beneficial, be prohibited by the sovereign under the penalty of death; if I commit this act, I shall be tried and condemned, and if I object to liverpool thesis the sentence, that it is contrary to binding oxford the law of liverpool thesis, God, who has commanded that human lawgivers shall not prohibit acts which have no evil consequences, the Court of Justice will demonstrate the inconclusiveness of my reasoning by hanging me up, in pursuance of the law of which I have impugned the essay leadership, validity (Austin 1995, 158).
Of course, as Brian Bix (1999) points out, the argument does little work for Austin because it is always possible for a court to liverpool thesis enforce a law against ib tok a person that does not satisfy Austin's own theory of legal validity. Another frequently expressed worry is that conceptual naturalism undermines the thesis, possibility of moral criticism of the law; inasmuch as conformity with natural law is a necessary condition for legal validity, all valid law is, by definition, morally just. Promotion Of Tourism. Thus, on this line of reasoning, the legal validity of a norm necessarily entails its moral justice. As Jules Coleman and Jeffrey Murphy (1990, 18) put the point: The important things [conceptual naturalism] supposedly allows us to do (e.g., morally evaluate the law and determine our moral obligations with respect to the law) are actually rendered more difficult by its collapse of the distinction between morality and law. If we really want to think about the law from the moral point of view, it may obscure the task if we see law and morality as essentially linked in some way. Thesis. Moral criticism and reform of law may be aided by promotion of tourism essay an initial moral skepticism about the law.
There are a couple of liverpool thesis, problems with this line of objection. First, conceptual naturalism does not foreclose criticism of 5 paragraph essay about, those norms that are being enforced by a society as law. Liverpool. Insofar as it can plausibly be claimed that the suggested thesis, content of a norm being enforced by society as law does not conform to the natural law, this is a legitimate ground of moral criticism: given that the norm being enforced by law is liverpool thesis unjust, it follows, according to conceptual naturalism, that it is promotion of tourism essay not legally valid. Thesis. Thus, the state commits wrong by enforcing that norm against private citizens. Second, and more importantly, this line of essay, objection seeks to criticize a conceptual theory of law by pointing to its practical implications n a strategy that seems to commit a category mistake.
Conceptual jurisprudence assumes the existence of a core of social practices (constituting law) that requires a conceptual explanation. The project motivating conceptual jurisprudence, then, is to articulate the concept of thesis, law in a way that accounts for these pre-existing social practices. Of Tourism Essay. A conceptual theory of law can legitimately be criticized for its failure to adequately account for liverpool the pre-existing data, as it were; but it cannot legitimately be criticized for either its normative quality or its practical implications. A more interesting line of argument has recently been taken up by Brian Bix (1996). Following John Finnis (1980), Bix rejects the interpretation of Aquinas and Blackstone as conceptual naturalists, arguing instead that the about leadership, claim that an unjust law is not a law should not be taken literally: A more reasonable interpretation of statements like an unjust law is no law at all is that unjust laws are not laws in the fullest sense. As we might say of some professional, who had the necessary degrees and credentials, but seemed nonetheless to lack the necessary ability or judgment: she's no lawyer or he's no doctor. This only indicates that we do not think that the thesis, title in this case carries with it all the ib tok 2005, implications it usually does.
Similarly, to say that an unjust law is not really law may only be to point out thesis, that it does not carry the same moral force or offer the same reasons for action as laws consistent with higher law (Bix 1996, 226). Thus, Bix construes Aquinas and suggested, Blackstone as having views more similar to the neo- naturalism of liverpool, John Finnis discussed below in Section III. Nevertheless, while a plausible case can be made in favor of Bix's view, the long history of construing Aquinas and Blackstone as conceptual naturalists, along with its pedagogical value in developing other theories of law, ensures that this practice is likely, for better or worse, to continue indefinitely. 3. The Substantive Neo-Naturalism of John Finnis. John Finnis takes himself to be explicating and developing the views of Aquinas and Blackstone.
Like Bix, Finnis believes that the naturalism of binding, Aquinas and Blackstone should not be construed as a conceptual account of the existence conditions for law. Thesis. According to Finnis, the classical naturalists were not concerned with giving a conceptual account of legal validity; rather they were concerned with explaining the moral force of law: the principles of natural law explain the obligatory force (in the fullest sense of 'obligation') of positive laws, even when those laws cannot be deduced from those principles (Finnis 1980, 23-24). On Finnis's view of the Overlap Thesis, the essential function of law is to provide a justification for state coercion (a view he shares with Ronald Dworkin). Accordingly, an unjust law can be legally valid, but it cannot provide an adequate justification for use of the state coercive power and suggested, is hence not obligatory in the fullest sense; thus, an unjust law fails to realize the liverpool thesis, moral ideals implicit in the concept of law. An unjust law, on this view, is thesis legally binding, but is not fully law. Like classical naturalism, Finnis's naturalism is both an ethical theory and a theory of law. Finnis distinguishes a number of equally valuable basic goods: life, health, knowledge, play, friendship, religion, and aesthetic experience. Each of thesis, these goods, according to Finnis, has intrinsic value in the sense that it should, given human nature, be valued for its own sake and not merely for the sake of some other good it can assist in bringing about. Moreover, each of these goods is universal in the sense that it governs all human cultures at all times. 5 Paragraph About Leadership. The point of moral principles, on this view, is to give ethical structure to the pursuit of these basic goods; moral principles enable us to select among competing goods and to define what a human being can permissibly do in pursuit of a basic good.
On Finnis's view, the liverpool thesis, conceptual point of 5 paragraph about leadership, law is to facilitate the common good by providing authoritative rules that solve coordination problems that arise in connection with the common pursuit of these basic goods. Thus, Finnis sums up his theory of law as follows: [T]he term 'law' . refer[s] primarily to rules made, in accordance with regulative legal rules, by a determinate and effective authority (itself identified and, standardly, constituted as an institution by legal rules) for a 'complete' community, and buttressed by sanctions in accordance with the rule-guided stipulations of adjudicative institutions, this ensemble of rules and institutions being directed to reasonably resolving any of the community's co-ordination problems (and to ratifying, tolerating, regulating, or overriding co-ordination solutions from liverpool, any other institutions or sources of norms) for the common good of that community (Finnis 1980, 276). Again, it bears emphasizing that Finnis takes care to deny that there is any necessary moral test for ib tok essay legal validity: one would simply be misunderstanding my conception of the nature and purpose of explanatory definitions of theoretical concepts if one supposed that my definition 'ruled out thesis, as non-laws' laws which failed to meet, or meet fully, one or other of the elements of the definition (Finnis 1980, 278). Nevertheless, Finnis believes that to the extent that a norm fails to satisfy these conditions, it likewise fails to fully manifest the promotion, nature of law and thereby fails to fully obligate the liverpool thesis, citizen-subject of the law. Unjust laws may obligate in a technical legal sense, on Finnis's view, but they may fail to provide moral reasons for action of the sort that it is the point of legal authority to provide. Thus, Finnis argues that a ruler's use of authority is radically defective if he exploits his opportunities by making stipulations intended by him not for the common good but for suggested his own or his friends' or party's or faction's advantage, or out of thesis, malice against 2005 some person or group (Finnis 1980, 352). For the ultimate basis of liverpool, a ruler's moral authority, on this view, is the fact that he has the opportunity, and thus the responsibility, of furthering the thesis, common good by stipulating solutions to a community's co- ordination problems (Finnis 1980, 351). Finnis's theory is liverpool certainly more plausible as a theory of law than the traditional interpretation of classical naturalism, but such plausibility comes, for 5 paragraph about leadership better or worse, at the expense of naturalism's identity as a distinct theory of law. Indeed, it appears that Finnis's natural law theory is compatible with naturalism's historical adversary, legal positivism, inasmuch as Finnis's view is liverpool compatible with a source-based theory of legal validity; laws that are technically valid in virtue of source but unjust do not, according to Finnis, fully obligate the citizen. Essay. Indeed, Finnis (1996) believes that Aquinas's classical naturalism fully affirms the notion that human laws are posited. 4. The Procedural Naturalism of Lon L. Fuller.
Like Finnis, Lon Fuller (1964) rejects the liverpool, conceptual naturalist idea that there are necessary substantive moral constraints on the content of law. Essay Amy Tan. But Fuller, unlike Finnis, believes that law is thesis necessarily subject to a procedural morality. Essay. On Fuller's view, human activity is necessarily goal-oriented or purposive in liverpool thesis, the sense that people engage in a particular activity because it helps them to achieve some end. Insofar as human activity is essentially purposive, according to Fuller, particular human activities can be understood only in ib tok essay, terms that make reference to their purposes and ends. Thus, since lawmaking is essentially purposive activity, it can be understood only in terms that explicitly acknowledge its essential values and purposes: The only formula that might be called a definition of law offered in these writings is by now thoroughly familiar: law is the enterprise of subjecting human conduct to the governance of liverpool, rules. Unlike most modern theories of law, this view treats law as an activity and regards a legal system as the of tourism, product of a sustained purposive effort (Fuller 1964, 106). To the extent that a definition of law can be given, then, it must include the idea that law's essential function is to achiev[e] [social] order through subjecting people's conduct to the guidance of general rules by liverpool which they may themselves orient their behavior (Fuller 1965, 657). Fuller's functionalist conception of law implies that nothing can count as law unless it is capable of performing law's essential function of guiding behavior. Ib Tok. And to be capable of performing this function, a system of rules must satisfy the following principles: (P1) the rules must be expressed in liverpool thesis, general terms; (P2) the rules must be publicly promulgated; (P3) the rules must be prospective in effect; (P4) the essay 2005, rules must be expressed in understandable terms; (P5) the rules must be consistent with one another; (P6) the rules must not require conduct beyond the powers of the affected parties; (P7) the rules must not be changed so frequently that the subject cannot rely on them; and (P8) the rules must be administered in a manner consistent with their wording.
On Fuller's view, no system of rules that fails minimally to satisfy these principles of legality can achieve law's essential purpose of achieving social order through the use of rules that guide behavior. Thesis. A system of rules that fails to satisfy (P2) or (P4), for example, cannot guide behavior because people will not be able to determine what the rules require. Accordingly, Fuller concludes that his eight principles are internal to law in atomic ethical?, the sense that they are built into thesis the existence conditions for law. These internal principles constitute a morality, according to Fuller, because law necessarily has positive moral value in two respects: (1) law conduces to a state of social order and (2) does so by essay about leadership respecting human autonomy because rules guide behavior. Since no system of rules can achieve these morally valuable objectives without minimally complying with the liverpool thesis, principles of legality, it follows, on Fuller's view, that they constitute a morality. Since these moral principles are built into the existence conditions for law, they are internal and hence represent a conceptual connection between law and morality. Thus, like the suggested, classical naturalists and unlike Finnis, Fuller subscribes to the strongest form of the Overlap Thesis, which makes him a conceptual naturalist. Nevertheless, Fuller's conceptual naturalism is liverpool fundamentally different from suggested, that of classical naturalism.
First, Fuller rejects the classical naturalist view that there are necessary moral constraints on thesis the content of essay leadership, law, holding instead that there are necessary moral constraints on liverpool thesis the procedural mechanisms by which law is made and administered: What I have called the internal morality of law is . a procedural version of natural law . Was The Atomic Bombings And Nagasaki Ethical?. [in the sense that it is] concerned, not with the substantive aims of legal rules, but with the ways in which a system of rules for thesis governing human conduct must be constructed and of Hiroshima ethical?, administered if it is to be efficacious and at the same time remain what it purports to be (Fuller 1964, 96- 97). Second, Fuller identifies the conceptual connection between law and morality at liverpool thesis a higher level of abstraction than the ib tok, classical naturalists. The classical naturalists view morality as providing substantive constraints on the content of individual laws; an unjust norm, on this view, is conceptually disqualified from being legally valid. In contrast, Fuller views morality as providing a constraint on the existence of a legal system: A total failure in any one of these eight directions does not simply result in a bad system of law; it results in something that is not properly called a legal system at all (Fuller 1964, 39). Fuller's procedural naturalism is vulnerable to a number of objections. Thesis. H.L.A. Hart, for binding oxford example, denies Fuller's claim that the principles of liverpool thesis, legality constitute an internal morality; according to Hart, Fuller confuses the notions of morality and thesis, efficacy: [T]he author's insistence on classifying these principles of legality as a morality is liverpool a source of confusion both for him and Was the atomic bombings of Hiroshima ethical?, his readers. [T]he crucial objection to the designation of these principles of thesis, good legal craftsmanship as morality, in spite of the promotion of tourism essay, qualification inner, is that it perpetrates a confusion between two notions that it is vital to hold apart: the notions of purposive activity and morality. Poisoning is no doubt a purposive activity, and reflections on liverpool thesis its purpose may show that it has its internal principles. (Avoid poisons however lethal if they cause the victim to vomit. ) But to call these principles of the poisoner's art the morality of poisoning would simply blur the distinction between the essay two kinds, notion of liverpool, efficiency for a purpose and suggested, those final judgments about liverpool thesis activities and purposes with which morality in its various forms is concerned (Hart 1965, 1285-86). On Hart's view, all actions, including virtuous acts like lawmaking and impermissible acts like poisoning, have their own internal standards of promotion essay, efficacy.
But insofar as such standards of efficacy conflict with morality, as they do in the case of poisoning, it follows that they are distinct from moral standards. Thesis. Thus, while Hart concedes that something like Fuller's eight principles are built into the existence conditions for law, he concludes they do not constitute a conceptual connection between law and morality. Unfortunately, Hart overlooks the ib tok essay 2005, fact that most of Fuller's eight principles double as moral ideals of fairness. For example, public promulgation in understandable terms may be a necessary condition for efficacy, but it is liverpool thesis also a moral ideal; it is morally objectionable for promotion a state to enforce rules that have not been publicly promulgated in terms reasonably calculated to give notice of what is required. Similarly, we take it for granted that it is wrong for a state to enact retroactive rules, inconsistent rules, and rules that require what is impossible. Poisoning may have its internal standards of efficacy, but such standards are distinguishable from the thesis, principles of legality in that they conflict with moral ideals. Nevertheless, Fuller's principles operate internally, not as moral ideals, but merely as principles of efficacy. Oxford. As Fuller would likely acknowledge, the existence of a legal system is consistent with considerable divergence from the principles of legality. Legal standards, for example, are necessarily promulgated in general terms that inevitably give rise to problems of vagueness. Liverpool Thesis. And officials all too often fail to administer the laws in a fair and even-handed manner even in Was the atomic bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki ethical?, the best of legal systems.
These divergences may always be prima facie objectionable, but they are inconsistent with a legal system only when they render a legal system incapable of performing its essential function of guiding behavior. Insofar as these principles are built into the existence conditions for liverpool thesis law, it is because they operate as efficacy conditions and ib tok essay 2005, not because they function as moral ideals. Ronald Dworkin's so-called third theory of law is best understood as a response to legal positivism, which is essentially constituted by three theoretical commitments: the Social Fact Thesis, the Conventionality Thesis, and the Separability Thesis. The Social Fact Thesis asserts it is a necessary truth that legal validity is ultimately a function of liverpool thesis, certain kinds of social facts; the idea here is that what ultimately explains the ib tok 2005, validity of a law is the presence of certain social facts, especially formal promulgation by thesis a legislature. The Conventionality Thesis emphasizes law's conventional nature, claiming that the social facts giving rise to thesis binding legal validity are authoritative in virtue of a social convention. On this view, the criteria that determine whether or not any given norm counts as a legal norm are binding because of an implicit or explicit agreement among officials.
Thus, for example, the U.S. Constitution is authoritative in virtue of the conventional fact that it was formally ratified by all fifty states. The Separability Thesis, at the most general level, simply denies naturalism's Overlap Thesis; according to the Separability Thesis, there is no conceptual overlap between the notions of law and morality. As Hart more narrowly construes it, the Separability Thesis is just the liverpool, simple contention that it is in no sense a necessary truth that laws reproduce or satisfy certain demands of morality, though in fact they have often done so (Hart 1994, 185-186). Dworkin rejects positivism's Social Fact Thesis on the ground that there are some legal standards the authority of which cannot be explained in terms of of tourism, social facts. In deciding hard cases, for example, judges often invoke moral principles that Dworkin believes do not derive their legal authority from the liverpool, social criteria of legality contained in a rule of recognition (Dworkin 1977, p. 40). In Riggs v. Palmer , for example, the court considered the question of whether a murderer could take under the will of his victim. At the thesis binding, time the case was decided, neither the statutes nor the liverpool thesis, case law governing wills expressly prohibited a murderer from taking under his victim's will. Despite this, the court declined to award the defendant his gift under the will on the ground that it would be wrong to essay 2005 allow him to profit from such a grievous wrong. On Dworkin's view, the court decided the case by liverpool thesis citing the principle that no man may profit from his own wrong as a background standard against which to read the suggested thesis, statute of wills and in this way justified a new interpretation of liverpool thesis, that statute (Dworkin 1977, 29).
On Dworkin's view, the Was the atomic of Hiroshima ethical?, Riggs court was not just reaching beyond the law to liverpool extralegal standards when it considered this principle. For the Riggs judges would rightfully have been criticized had they failed to consider this principle; if it were merely an extralegal standard, there would be no rightful grounds to criticize a failure to consider it (Dworkin 1977, 35). Accordingly, Dworkin concludes that the best explanation for the propriety of suggested, such criticism is that principles are part of the law. Further, Dworkin maintains that the legal authority of standards like the Riggs principle cannot derive from promulgation in liverpool thesis, accordance with purely formal requirements: [e]ven though principles draw support from the official acts of legal institutions, they do not have a simple or direct enough connection with these acts to frame that connection in terms of 5 paragraph essay about leadership, criteria specified by some ultimate master rule of recognition (Dworkin 1977, 41). On Dworkin's view, the legal authority of the Riggs principle can be explained wholly in terms of its content. The Riggs principle was binding, in part, because it is a requirement of fundamental fairness that figures into the best moral justification for a society's legal practices considered as a whole. A moral principle is legally authoritative, according to Dworkin, insofar as it maximally conduces to the best moral justification for thesis a society's legal practices considered as a whole. Dworkin believes that a legal principle maximally contributes to such a justification if and only if it satisfies two conditions: (1) the principle coheres with existing legal materials; and (2) the principle is the most morally attractive standard that satisfies (1). The correct legal principle is the promotion of tourism, one that makes the liverpool thesis, law the moral best it can be.
Accordingly, on binding Dworkin's view, adjudication is and should be interpretive: [J]udges should decide hard cases by interpreting the political structure of liverpool, their community in the following, perhaps special way: by trying to find the best justification they can find, in principles of political morality, for the structure as a whole, from the most profound constitutional rules and arrangements to the details of, for Was the bombings and Nagasaki example, the private law of tort or contract (Dworkin 1982, 165). There are, thus, two elements of a successful interpretation. First, since an interpretation is successful insofar as it justifies the particular practices of a particular society, the interpretation must fit with those practices in the sense that it coheres with existing legal materials defining the liverpool thesis, practices. Second, since an bombings of Hiroshima ethical? interpretation provides a moral justification for those practices, it must present them in the best possible moral light. For this reason, Dworkin argues that a judge should strive to liverpool thesis interpret a case in roughly the following way: A thoughtful judge might establish for promotion essay himself, for example, a rough threshold of thesis, fit which any interpretation of data must meet in order to be acceptable on the dimension of fit, and then suppose that if more than one interpretation of suggested, some part of the liverpool thesis, law meets this threshold, the choice among these should be made, not through further and more precise comparisons between the two along that dimension, but by choosing the interpretation which is substantively better, that is, which better promotes the binding oxford, political ideals he thinks correct (Dworkin 1982, 171). As Dworkin conceives it, then, the judge must approach judicial decision-making as something that resembles an exercise in moral philosophy. Thus, for example, the judge must decide cases on the basis of thesis, those moral principles that figure in the soundest theory of law that can be provided as a justification for the explicit substantive and institutional rules of the jurisdiction in question (Dworkin 1977, 66). And this is a process, according to binding oxford Dworkin, that must carry the lawyer very deep into political and moral theory. Indeed, in thesis, later writings, Dworkin goes so far as to thesis binding oxford claim, somewhat implausibly, that any judge's opinion is itself a piece of legal philosophy, even when the liverpool, philosophy is hidden and the visible argument is dominated by citation and lists of Was the atomic and Nagasaki ethical?, facts (Dworkin 1986, 90). Dworkin believes his theory of judicial obligation is a consequence of what he calls the liverpool thesis, Rights Thesis, according to which judicial decisions always enforce pre-existing rights: even when no settled rule disposes of the case, one party may nevertheless have a right to win.
It remains the judge's duty, even in ib tok, hard cases, to discover what the liverpool thesis, rights of the parties are, not to invent new rights retrospectively (Dworkin 1977, 81). In Hard Cases, Dworkin distinguishes between two kinds of legal argument. Arguments of policy justify a political decision by promotion of tourism showing that the decision advances or protects some collective goal of the community as a whole (Dworkin 1977, 82). In contrast, arguments of liverpool, principle justify a political decision by showing that the decision respects or secures some individual or group right (Dworkin 1977, 82). On Dworkin's view, while the legislature may legitimately enact laws that are justified by arguments of thesis oxford, policy, courts may not pursue such arguments in liverpool, deciding cases. For a consequentialist argument of policy can never provide an adequate justification for deciding in 2005, favor of liverpool thesis, one party's claim of right and against another party's claim of right. An appeal to a pre-existing right, according to Dworkin, can ultimately be justified only by an argument of principle.
Thus, insofar as judicial decisions necessarily adjudicate claims of right, they must ultimately be based on the moral principles that figure into the best justification of the legal practices considered as a whole. Notice that Dworkin's views on legal principles and judicial obligation are inconsistent with all three of legal positivism's core commitments. Each contradicts the Conventionality Thesis insofar as judges are bound to interpret posited law in light of unposited moral principles. Each contradicts the thesis binding, Social Fact Thesis because these moral principles count as part of a community's law regardless of whether they have been formally promulgated. Most importantly, Dworkin's view contradicts the liverpool thesis, Separability Thesis in that it seems to imply that some norms are necessarily valid in virtue of their moral content.
It is his denial of the suggested, Separability Thesis that places Dworkin in the naturalist camp.
Custom Academic Paper Writing Services -
Liverpool and the Raw Cotton Trade - VUW research archive - Victoria
14 Skills and liverpool thesis, Values Employers Seek in suggested thesis, Jobseekers. by Randall S. Hansen, Ph.D., and liverpool, Katharine Hansen, Ph.D. Job Skills to list on your Resume. Deals with acting in 5 paragraph leadership, a responsible and liverpool thesis, fair manner in thesis, all your personal and work activities, which is seen as a sign of maturity and self-confidence; avoid being petty. How to describe this skill on your resume: Conscientious go-getter who is highly organized, dedicated, and committed to thesis, professionalism. Employers probably respect personal integrity more than any other value, especially in light of the many recent corporate scandals. How to describe this skill on suggested your resume: Seasoned professional whose honesty and integrity create effective leadership and optimal business relationships. Deals with openness to liverpool thesis, new ideas and concepts, to working independently or as part of a team, and to carrying out multiple tasks or projects.
How to describe this skill on suggested your resume: Highly adaptable, mobile, positive, resilient, patient risk-taker who is open to new ideas. Employers seek jobseekers who love what they do and will keep at it until they solve the problem and liverpool thesis, get the job done. How to describe this skill on your resume: Productive worker with solid work ethic who exerts optimal effort in promotion of tourism essay, successfully completing tasks. 5.Dependability/Reliability/Responsibility. There#8217;s no question that all employers desire employees who will arrive to work every day? on time? and ready to work, and thesis, who will take responsibility for suggested thesis, their actions.
How to describe this skill on your resume: Dependable, responsible contributor committed to excellence and success. Employers want employees who will have a strong devotion to the company? even at liverpool thesis, times when the company is not necessarily loyal to its employees. How to describe this skill on your resume: Loyal and dedicated manager with an excellent work record. 7.Positive Attitude/Motivation/Energy/Passion. The jobseekers who get hired and the employees who get promoted are the ones with drive and passion? and essay two kinds, who demonstrate this enthusiasm through their words and actions. How to describe this skill on your resume: Energetic performer consistently cited for unbridled passion for work, sunny disposition, and upbeat, positive attitude. Look at it this way: if you don#8217;t believe in yourself, in your unique mix of skills, education, and abilities, why should a prospective employer? Be confident in yourself and what you can offer employers.
How to describe this skill on liverpool thesis your resume: Confident, hard-working employee who is committed to achieving excellence. 9.Self-Motivated/Ability to Work Without Supervision. While teamwork is always mentioned as an binding oxford, important skill, so is the ability to work independently, with minimal supervision. How to describe this skill on your resume: Highly motivated self-starter who takes initiative with minimal supervision. No matter what your age, no matter how much experience you have, you should always be willing to learn a new skill or technique. Jobs are constantly changing and evolving, and liverpool, you must show an openness to grow and learn with that change. How to describe this skill on your resume: Enthusiastic, knowledge-hungry learner, eager to meet challenges and quickly assimilate new concepts.
While there is some debate about whether leadership is something people are born with, these skills deal with your ability to 5 paragraph about, take charge and manage your co-workers. How to describe this skill on your resume: Goal-driven leader who maintains a productive climate and confidently motivates, mobilizes, and coaches employees to liverpool, meet high-performance standards. 12.Multicultural Sensitivity/Awareness. There is suggested thesis possibly no bigger issue in the workplace than diversity, and jobseekers must demonstrate a sensitivity and awareness to other people and cultures. How to describe this skill on your resume: Personable professional whose strengths include cultural sensitivity and an ability to build rapport with a diverse workforce in multicultural settings. Deals with your ability to design, plan, organize, and implement projects and tasks within an allotted timeframe. Also, involves goal-setting. How to describe this skill on thesis your resume: Results-driven achiever with exemplary planning and organizational skills, along with a high degree of promotion of tourism essay detail orientation.
Because so many jobs involve working in one or more work-groups, you must have the ability to work with others in thesis, a professional manner while attempting to achieve a common goal. How to ib tok, describe this skill on your resume: Resourceful team player who excels at building trusting relationships with customers and colleagues. Liverpool Thesis! Final Thoughts on promotion Employment Skills and Values. Employability skills and personal values are the critical tools and traits you need to succeed in the workplace? and thesis, they are all elements that you can learn, cultivate, develop, and ib tok essay, maintain over your lifetime. Once you have identified the sought-after skills and values and assessed the degree to which you possess them, begin to market them by building them into your resume, cover letter, and interview answers) for liverpool thesis, job-search success. See also our Transferable Job Skills for Jobseekers.Click here to begin building your own resume! More Information about Employability Skills:
Skills Employers Seek, reporting on annual results from the National Association of Colleges and Employers (NACE) survey of employers to determine the top 10 personal qualities/skills employers seek. From the Career Development Center at Binghamton University. Skills Employers Seek, from Loughborough University. Skills Employers Seek, from Psych Web Top 10 Soft Skills in Demand, from thesis binding, LiveCareer Resume Skills Section, from LiveCareer. Building Tools That Build Better Work Lives. Since 2005, LiveCareer’s team of career coaches, certified resume writers, and savvy technologists have been developing career tools that have helped over 10 million users build stronger resumes, write more persuasive cover letters, and develop better interview skills. Thesis! Use our free samples, templates, and writing guides and two kinds, our easy-to-use resume builder software to help land the liverpool thesis job you want. Dr. Randall S. Hansen. Dr. Randall S. Hansen is founder of binding oxford Quintessential Careers, one of the oldest and most comprehensive career development sites on the Web, as well CEO of EmpoweringSites.com.
He is also founder of MyCollegeSuccessStory.com and EnhanceMyVocabulary.com. He is publisher of Quintessential Careers Press, including the Quintessential Careers electronic newsletter, QuintZine. Liverpool Thesis! Dr. Hansen is also a published author, with several books, chapters in books, and hundreds of articles. 5 Paragraph Leadership! He’s often quoted in the media and conducts empowering workshops around the country. Finally, Dr.
Hansen is liverpool thesis also an educator, having taught at the college level for more than 15 years. Visit his personal Website or reach him by email at firstname.lastname@example.org. Check out essay amy tan Dr. Hansen on GooglePlus. Katharine Hansen, Ph.D., creative director and associate publisher of Quintessential Careers, is an liverpool thesis, educator, author, and blogger who provides content for Quintessential Careers, edits QuintZine, an electronic newsletter for jobseekers, and blogs about storytelling in the job search at A Storied Career. Katharine, who earned her PhD in thesis oxford, organizational behavior from Union Institute University, Cincinnati, OH, is author of Dynamic Cover Letters for New Graduates and A Foot in the Door: Networking Your Way into the Hidden Job Market (both published by Ten Speed Press), as well as Top Notch Executive Resumes (Career Press); and with Randall S. Hansen, Ph.D., Dynamic Cover Letters, Write Your Way to a Higher GPA (Ten Speed), and The Complete Idiot’s Guide to Study Skills (Alpha). Visit her personal Website or reach her by e-mail at liverpool, email@example.com.
Check out Dr. Hansen on GooglePlus. I AM A CAREER CHANGER This page is your key source for all things career-change related. You#8217;ll find some great free career-change tools and thesis, resources. Changing careers can be traumatic, especially if you have been in your current career for a long time, but you do not have to go through the process alone or  Quintessential Careers: Career and Job-Hunting Blog. Quintessential Careers: Career and Job-Hunting Blog Career and job-search news, trends, and thesis, scoops for job-seekers, compiled by the staff of Quintessential Careers.The Quintessential Careers Blog has moved!!
These pages remain as an archive of our previous blog posts. Please check out the new and improved Quintessential Careers Blog for Job-Seekers and Careerists. Interview Advice Job  The Quintessential Directory of Company Career Centers. The Quintessential Directory of Company Career Centers Where job-seekers can go directly to the job/career/employment section of suggested thesis a specific employer#8217;s Website.Because more and more companies are developing career and employment centers on thesis their corporate Websites, Quintessential Careers has developed this directory, which allows you to go straight to the career and employment section of the  Quintessential Careers: I am a Career Coach or Counselor. The Quintessential Directory of Company Career Centers Where job-seekers can go directly to the job/career/employment section of a specific employer#8217;s Website.Because more and more companies are developing career and thesis, employment centers on their corporate Websites, Quintessential Careers has developed this directory, which allows you to go straight to the career and thesis, employment section of the  Mighty Recruiter Mighty Recruiter. Customer Service Customer Service.
800-652-8430 Mon- Fri 8am - 8pm CST. Sat 8am - 5pm CST, Sun 10am - 6pm CST Stay in touch with us.
Expert Essay Writers -
Theses and Dissertations - Library Guides - University of Liverpool
Fashion Institute Of Technology Essay. Fashion Institute Of Technology Essay. Fashion Institute Of Technology Essay. Our writers know it all perfectly well. That is why we are called a professional essay writing service.
We know what you need and we do our best to deliver it. Our services are just as good as they should be: Our writers are native speakers who have been students just like you. They have at least a master’s degree ? it means they know well how to write an assignment. All of liverpool our writers have majored in of tourism, a certain subject area. You can be sure that your paper will be assigned to a true specialist.
Your essay will be delivered before the deadline. When you buy essays online, you select a deadline yourself. You probably know that the earlier you start the better. What makes us different is that we will take your order even if it’s due in several hours. You control the writing process. As soon as you make an order, you get your writer’s contact ID.
You can ask for a draft, make corrections, and liverpool modify instructions to make sure that you’ll get exactly what you need as a result. You get all notifications delivered to your email or via text messages, if you choose this option. So why should you buy essays online from us? Just as you study to suggested get a grade, we work to make our customers (that’s you) satisfied. We offer you a number of guarantees, which makes us stand out from the liverpool, rest of the ib tok 2005, essay writing companies. Here they are: No plagiarism. This is crucial for both of us. That’s why we’re pointing it out again and again. Free formatting and references. We charge only for pages of actual text; a references page is and will always be free.
Communication with your writer. Thesis. You can contacts your writer at suggested thesis, any time to thesis see the essay about, draft, make sure they are on the right track, or provide any additional guidelines at their request. 2 weeks of free revision. Liverpool. Your instructor may have some comments on your paper. We are ready to make any corrections for 14 whole days absolutely for free. 24/7 support.
If you experience any difficulties or have any questions about our services, don’t hesitate to essay contact the Support. They are always here to help. Money back. Thesis. We are seriously going to refund your payment if you are not satisfied with the result. No matter how complex your topic or how long your assignment is, our writers at BuyEssay.net will deliver the highest-quality paper within the right amount of time. Do not struggle on thesis your own. Buy essays online by simply clicking the button below and filling in the order form. should be there!
One inch margin top, bottom, left, right; Title and Reference pages are free of liverpool thesis charge. In case Client needs a single-spaced Paper they are to pay a double fee. Essay Leadership. The standard Paper formatting includes a Title page , main content of the thesis, Paper, and a Reference page. Note that you pay only for the main content of the Paper, while a Title page and a Reference page are provided free of charge. buyessay.net reserves the right to use any relevant materials available, such as books, journals, newspapers, interviews, online publications, etc., unless the Client indicates some specific sources to be used. PLACING AN ORDER. When placing your order, you must provide accurate and complete information. You are solely responsible for any possible consequences and of Hiroshima misunderstandings, in case you provide us with inaccurate and/or incorrect and/or unfaithful information. Please be advised that you will be asked to give final confirmation to the instructions you provide in order details. Your Paper instructions should be confirmed in your Order Tracking Area within 3 hours after placing your order (and within 1 hour for orders with urgency less than 24 hours).
Orders without instructions will not be worked on and may be delayed and you accept sole responsibility for such delay. Thesis. buyessay.net guarantees that the promotion, delivered Paper will meet only confirmed requirements. Liverpool Thesis. You must not change the instructions once you have confirmed them. Any alterations to confirmed instructions are considered as additional order, thereby requiring additional payment. All payments are due upon receipt. If the payment is not received or payment method is declined, the Client forfeits of Services.
All fees are exclusive of all taxes and/or levies, and/or duties imposed by taxing authorities, and atomic bombings of Hiroshima ethical? you shall be responsible for liverpool thesis payment of suggested all such taxes and/or levies, and/or duties. Liverpool Thesis. You agree to pay any such taxes that might be applicable to your use of the Services and thesis payments made by liverpool you under these Terms. If at any time you contact your bank or credit card company and promotion essay decline or otherwise reject the charge of any payment, this act will be considered as a breach of your obligation hereunder and your use of the Services will be automatically terminated. Use of stolen credit card and/or any credit card fraud is liverpool, considered to thesis binding be a serious crime. buyessay.net closely cooperates with our payment provider to liverpool thesis prevent and fight online fraud. In case of any online fraud, appropriate state authorities will be contacted immediately. By doing a chargeback, you agree to give up all your rights to the Paper automatically. At the same time, you authorize buyessay.net to publish the promotion of tourism, completed Paper and start the authorship procedure that will allow us to thesis determine if you have used any parts of the Paper. The procedure may include contacting your school officials and/or posting your full details along with the two kinds, completed Paper online.
buyessay.net reserves the right to change its prices at any time in its sole discretion and such changes or modifications shall be posted online at liverpool, the Website and become effective immediately without need for further notice to any Client and/or user. We care about thesis, our Clients and are always looking for ways to liverpool thesis offer them the best value for money. One method we use is a discount system. buyessay.net, at its sole discretion, shall have the ib tok, right to provide our Clients with discount programs as described more fully and published on thesis the Website. According to our loyalty program, you earn back 10% of your total bill in Points (1 currency unit (inter alia USD/ EUR/ GBP etc.) = 1 Point) after you make your first order. Ib Tok Essay. Your Points are accumulated on your Credit Balance. “Credit Balance” is an account for Points of liverpool thesis a Client which can be used for future purchases on the Website exclusively. Bombings Of Hiroshima Ethical?. You can use your Points for your next purchases on thesis the Website exclusively. Your Points cannot be refunded. The discount may be obtained by the use of the promo code. The amount of Points added to the Credit Balance is calculated on the basis of the order price excluding the essay two kinds amy tan, applied discount (if any).
Later, 5% of every next order (not including credits) is liverpool, added to your Credit Balance. buyessay.net will issue a refund to you only according to these Terms. buyessay.net offers a 14-day money back period for Papers less than 20 pages and a 30-day period for 2005 Papers more than 20 pages (”Refund Period”). Liverpool. Refund Period begins on the date of Client`s order deadline and expires on the last day of the Refund Period. In case you are not satisfied with any of the Services, you can submit a refund request according to these Terms within the Refund Period. Once the Refund Period elapses, buyessay.net will not refund any amounts paid. If the order is not completed and/or the Paper is not downloaded or delivered in its complete form by or to you, the full refund is issued at any time. In the event of order cancellation, the atomic ethical?, funds will be debited back only to the account of the initial payment within 5-7 business days from the liverpool, time of cancellation request. In other case buyessay.net assesses refund requests on a case-by-case basis as there are usually unique reasons as to why a refund request is made. Essay. Please note that if you request a refund, we may require documented proof that the quality of liverpool thesis your order is low (e.g., scan copy of your instructor’s feedback, plagiarism report, etc.).
Should you feel it necessary to make a refund request, we will immediately forward your order to binding our Quality Assurance Department. After comparing their findings with the reasons for dissatisfaction, the necessary corrective actions will be taken. Any refund request must be made within the Refund Period. In case buyessay.net reimburses the money because of mistakes or some irrelevance to the initial instructions, our Quality Assurance Department, at its sole discretion, evaluates the quality of the Paper and refunds an amount comparable to liverpool thesis the percentage of incorrect content in the Paper and mistakes present in it. buyessay.net provides various methods of contact (i.e. email, telephone, message board, and live chat) to facilitate communication between you, us and the writer assigned to complete an order.
Using any of these methods, our Customer Support Center is ib tok essay 2005, available to you at thesis, any time and will respond to any refund request or other issue promptly. Thesis. However, if such a request is not received using any of the thesis, aforementioned methods within the Refund Period, buyessay.net will not be obliged to honor or consider the above said request. Should the two kinds, Paper delivery be delayed due to unexpected circumstances, from the liverpool thesis, side of buyessay.net, we may provide compensation for the breach of the thesis oxford, order deadline in the form of a credit or a discount to liverpool thesis be used towards your next order with us. Please be informed that delivery time deviation is not a subject to refund. Any revision request or complaint in regards to a Paper that buyessay.net has provided must be made within the revision period (“Revision Period”). buyessay.net offers a 14-day Revision Period for binding oxford Papers less than 20 pages and a 30-day period for Papers more than 20 pages. Revision Period begins on the date of Client`s order deadline and liverpool expires on the last day of the Revision Period. After that point, no revision and/or complaint will be accepted.
buyessay.net recognizes that orders vary in essay amy tan, size and thesis complexity; as a result, dissertation, thesis and/or other sufficiently large assignment may be granted 30-day Revision Period. Essay Two Kinds Amy Tan. Sufficiency in thesis, the size of the thesis, Paper will be determined by buyessay.net in its sole discretion. In case a request for revision is liverpool thesis, not submitted within the Revision Period, buyessay.net tacitly accepts that the Client is satisfied with the suggested, Paper and requires no further actions to be taken in regards to liverpool thesis the Paper unless extra payment is provided or a new order is placed. Upon receiving your completed assignment you are entitled to a free revision should the Paper fail to two kinds amy tan meet your instructions or defined the requirements in any way. Thesis. When this is the case, you are entitled to request as many revisions as may be required to make the Paper consistent and 5 paragraph about leadership compliant with your instructions.
During the Revision Period the thesis, request for revision may be made at ib tok, any time. All revisions must be based on thesis the original order instructions. If at essay 2005, the time of the revision request you provide new, additional, or differing instructions, this will be interpreted as an thesis application for new Paper and thus, will require an additional payment. 5 Paragraph About. Furthermore, should you request a revision after the Revision Period, it will also be considered as a new order requiring an additional payment. We may require you to supply us with personal identifying information, and we may also legally consult other sources to obtain information about you. By accepting these Terms and Conditions, you authorize us to make any inquiries we consider necessary to validate the information that you provide us with.
for the outcome or consequences of liverpool submission the Paper to any academic institution; and. excludes all liability for damages arising out of or in connection with your use of this Website. The latter includes, without limitation, damage caused to your computer, computer software, systems and programs and the data thereon, or any other direct or indirect, consequential and incidental damages. The Paper provided to you by 5 paragraph essay leadership buyessay.net remains our property and is the subject to liverpool copyright and other intellectual property rights under local and international laws conventions. The Paper is intended for your personal use only and it may not be used, copied, reproduced, distributed, transmitted, broadcast, displayed, sold, licensed, or otherwise exploited for any other purposes without our prior written consent.
You agree not to of tourism essay engage in the use, copying, or distribution of thesis Papers other than expressly permitted herein. We post Clients` testimonials on our Website which may contain personal information (first name or initials). Hereby by accessing or using this Website, you provide us with your consent to post your first name/initials along with your testimonial on our Website. We ensure our posting these testimonials does not interfere with your confidentiality. If you wish to request the removal of your testimonial, you may contact us at [emailprotected] NOTIFICATION OF CHANGES.
We may use, or we may engage third-parties to use on our behalf, cookies or similar web tags (small data text files placed on your computer or device) or similar technologies to identify Your computer or device and record Your preferences and liverpool other data so that our Website can personalize Your visit(s), see which areas and features of our Website are popular, and improve our Website and Your experience. Depending upon Your computer, You may be able to set Your browser(s) to reject cookies or delete cookies, but that may result in the loss of some functionality on the Website. We may also use web beacons (small graphic images on a web page or an HTML e-mail) to monitor interaction with our websites or e-mails. Web beacons are generally invisible because they are very small (only 1-by-1 pixel) and the same color as the background of the web page or e-mail message. Web Browsing Activity.
When accessing our Website, We automatically collect certain information about Your computer and essay Your visit, such as your IP address, browser type, date and time, the liverpool thesis, web page You visited before visiting our Website, Your activities and essay purchases on liverpool our Website, and of tourism other analytical information associated with the Website. Information From Other Sources. We may also obtain information about You from other sources. For example, We may receive credit information from third-party sources before initiating Your service. Liverpool. We may also purchase or obtain Personal Information (for example, e-mail lists, postal mail lists, demographic and Was the marketing data) from others. HOW WE USE INFORMATION WE COLLECT ABOUT YOU. We use the liverpool, information We collect for a variety of essay business purposes, such as:
To provide and bill for Services You purchase; To deliver and confirm Services You obtain from us; To verify Your identity and maintain a record of Your transactions and interactions with us; To provide customer services to thesis You; To create, modify, improve, enhance, remove or fix our Services and their performance; To identify and binding suggest products or services that might interest You; To make internal business decisions about current and liverpool thesis future Service offerings;
To provide You customized user experiences, including personalized Services offerings; To protect our rights, interests, safety and essay property and that of our customers, service providers and other third parties; and. To comply with law or as required for liverpool legal purposes. We may use Personal Information for essay 2005 investigations or prevention of fraud or network abuse. We may use information we collect to contact You about liverpool, our and/or third-party products, services, and suggested thesis offers that We believe You may find of thesis interest. 2005. We may contact You by telephone, postal mail, e-mail, or other methods. You may see advertisements when You visit our Website. We may help advertisers better reach our customers by providing certain customer information, including geographic information, language preferences or demographic information obtained from other companies. Thesis. This information is used by advertisers to determine which ads may be more relevant to essay You.
However, we do not share Personal Information outside of our corporate family for advertising purposes without Your consent. WHEN WE SHARE INFORMATION COLLECTED ABOUT YOU. We do not sell, license, rent, or otherwise provide Your Personal Information to unaffiliated third-parties (parties outside our corporate family) without Your consent. We may, however, disclose Your information to unaffiliated third-parties as follows: With Your Consent. We may disclose Personal Information about You to third-parties with Your consent. We may obtain Your consent in writing; online, through “click-through” agreements; when You accept the terms of disclosures for thesis certain Services; orally, when You interact with our customer service representatives. We encourage You not to atomic bombings of Hiroshima share Your password. If You provide Your user account password and/or security question responses to liverpool third parties they will have access to Your Personal Information when they access Your user account with Your account password. To Our Service Providers. We may disclose information to third-party vendors and suggested partners who complete transactions or perform services on thesis our behalf (for example, credit/debit card processing, billing, customer service, auditing, and marketing).
In a Business Transfer. We may sell, disclose, or transfer information about essay about, You as part of a corporate business transaction, such as a merger or acquisition, joint venture, corporate reorganization, financing, or sale of company assets, or in the unlikely event of insolvency, bankruptcy, or receivership, in which such information could be transferred to third-parties as a business asset in liverpool, the transaction. For Legal Process Protection. We may disclose Personal Information, and ib tok other information about thesis, You, or Your communications, where we have a good faith belief that access, use, preservation or disclosure of thesis binding oxford such information is reasonably necessary: to satisfy any applicable law, regulation, legal process or enforceable governmental request; to enforce or apply agreements, or initiate, render, bill, and collect for services and products (including to collection agencies in order to obtain payment for our products and services); to protect our rights or interests, or property or safety or that of others; in connection with claims, disputes, or litigation – in court or elsewhere; to facilitate or verify the appropriate calculation of taxes, fees, or other obligations; or. in an emergency situation.
We may provide information that does not identify You personally to third-parties for marketing, advertising or other purposes. HOW WE STORE AND PROTECT THE INFORMATION COLLECTED ABOUT YOU. Protecting Your Information. We use a variety of physical, electronic, and procedural safeguards to liverpool protect Personal Information from unauthorized access, use, or disclosure while it is under our control. Unfortunately, no data transmission over the internet can be guaranteed to be completely secure. As a result, although we will utilize such measures, we do not guarantee You against the loss, misuse, or alteration of Personal Information under our control, and You provide Personal Information to us at Your own risk. Bombings Of Hiroshima. You should always take care with how You handle and liverpool disclose your Personal Information and should avoid sending Personal Information through insecure e-mail, social networks or other internet channels. Retention and Disposal.
With further purchases, a Partner earns 5% of the Referral’s total order price. All money earned with the Referral Program is stored on thesis your Referral Balance. A Partner can transfer the money to the Bonus Balance and use it to purchase a service. It is possible to transfer the liverpool thesis, sum to the Partner’s PayPal account (no less than $20).